Below is a memo from Gary Hall, the Dean and President at Seabury. This is a public document that has been distributed to the faculty, staff, and students of the seminary. Seabury is not closing, but this is a big, big development in our life together.
February 20, 2008
To: Students, Faculty, and Staff of Seabury
The Board of Trustees of Seabury-Western Theological Seminary spent two days at its regular February meeting in discussion of the immediate opportunities and challenges before the seminary. There are, first, enormously creative opportunities facing seminaries today. Many areas of the church are developing new ways both of doing and preparing for ministry. And multiple church groups continue to call for a new range of educational services from our institutions of theological education: continuing education for clergy, lay education, distance learning, and consulting services for congregations and dioceses.
At the same time, all the seminaries of the Episcopal Church face real economic and missional challenges. The stand-alone residential model developed in the nineteenth century is becoming unsustainable for most of our institutions. Bishops, congregations, and seminarians have fewer resources to allot to the education of seminarians. And the cost of theological education has resulted in an unprecedented level of student debt.
Like many other Episcopal Church institutions, over the past two decades Seabury has both confronted and thought hard about how it can adapt to the challenges and opportunities of the present moment. We have come to the realization that we cannot continue to operate as we have in the past and that there is both loss and good news in that. We believe that the church does not need Seabury in its present form; there are a number of other schools who do what we have traditionally done as well as we do. But we also believe that the church very much needs a seminary animated by and organized around a new vision of theological education—one that is centered in a vision of Baptism and its implications for the whole church, one which is flexible and adaptive and collaborative in nature. We are committed to Seabury’s historic and ongoing ministry as a vital center of theological education, reflection, and congregational study. We are enthusiastic about the prospect of doing this in a new and, we hope, more economically feasible and pedagogically innovative way. At its heart, Seabury will always be a school in service of the mission of God as proclaimed and enacted in the life, death, and resurrection of Jesus Christ.
At our regular February meeting, the Board adopted the following resolution:
The Board, having heard a report by the Dean as to the state of Seabury and the rapidly changing and expanding needs for theological education in the Episcopal Church, and being deeply mindful of its mission responsibilities for the operation of the seminary, and the uses of the seminary’s resources, hereby resolves:
1. The Dean is directed to prepare and present to the Board, on or before the next scheduled meeting, a detailed plan for the future operation of Seabury, including a financial plan that brings expenses in line with revenues. The report will also include recommendations for the immediate future of current programs.
2. The Dean will be assisted in developing the plan by a Planning Committee to be made up of eight members, of whom six will be officers and/or trustees, who will be named by the Dean and Board Chair, and two will be faculty members named by the faculty. Should the faculty not choose its representatives on or before Monday, February 25, 2008, the Dean may make the appointments as he deems necessary.
3. In developing the plan, the Dean or his designees may explore potential partnerships with appropriate institutions.
4. The Dean and the Planning Committee may hire consultants they deem necessary to assist them in their deliberations.
After consultation with the faculty, students, and staff, the Planning Committee met on Tuesday, February 19, 2008. The Planning Committee asked the board’s Executive Committee to clarify its understanding of the long-range educational mission of Seabury, and it proposed two resolutions which the Executive Committee passed in the following form on Wednesday, February 20, 2008:
The Executive Committee affirms that Seabury will no longer offer the M.Div. as a freestanding 3-year residential program. This does not preclude offering the M.Div. in other formats.
The Executive Committee accepts the 3 following recommendations of the Planning Committee:
1. That Seabury will immediately suspend recruitment and admissions to all degree and certificate programs in this time of discernment.
2. That Seabury will enable all current D.Min. students to complete their programs.
3. That Seabury will assist all current M.Div., MTS, MA, and certificate students to find alternative arrangements for the completion of their programs as may be required.
The Planning Committee will continue its schedule of weekly meetings so that it can produce a financial and programmatic plan in time for a special board meeting to be called in April. In the meantime, Seabury’s administration is at work talking with potential partner institutions both to enable the school to move forward in the future and to enable all those affected by these decisions to make the transitions they may be required to make as plans emerge.
Our hearts and minds are filled with a multitude of emotions. At the center of our immediate concern is the well being of our students, faculty and staff. Accordingly, most of our energies are focused on the internal community at this time, however, we will be informing our alumni/ae, donors, and the wider church within the next several days. Please keep us in your thoughts and prayers as we move into this new understanding of our mission.
The Very Reverend Gary R. Hall, Ph.D.
Posted by Frank Yamada at February 21, 2008 10:25 PMHow do you (and other readers) make sense of this statement? What is the part of the Seabury identity, or brand, that continues and has a future, without the residential MDiv students; that is more financially viable than the previous model; meets a discernable need in the church; and can be put in place soon enough to count as continuity, rather than new project with new players? These are the questions that the statement raises for me, leaving me confused about the upbeat tone of the first part of the letter.
Posted by: Margaret at February 22, 2008 01:55 AMWhat Margaret said. Those are the same questions I have.
And as a donor, I'd really like to see documentation of the financial challenges facing the community.
Posted by: Emily Schnabl at February 22, 2008 03:56 AMMargaret, I’m sorry if my responses are brief. It has been a very long day (long few days), and I need some sleep before I go to the Planning Committee meeting tomorrow morning.
You have asked many questions, many of which I believe I could answer more clearly in a phone conversation. Honestly, right now I am so tired, I wouldn’t want to write something that I would later have to clarify further. Feel free to give me a call over the weekend if you like. Given your place and situation (assuming this is the Margaret that I know), I am also sure that Gary or Ruth would be happy to explain things.
Emily, thank you for your post. You are talking to the wrong guy about accessing financial numbers; however, the financial challenges of Seabury are not news. We have been in this type of financial atmosphere for several years, possibly over a decade or more. I will ask our communications consultant about how information is being relayed to donors.
Posted by: Frank at February 22, 2008 05:32 AMThanks Frank, and I can only imagine how exhausting it must be to be in the midst of things. I don't feel the need for you personally to say more. I do have a pretty good sense of how things are proceeding, and I know how hard it is to answer questions when in the midst of something that's in process. I'm fine with leaving my questions open for the moment, reflecting my particular theological concerns about identity and change, continuity and discontinuity. Meanwhile, I'm working on writing and--quickly-- finding a job. Prayers all around for fortitude, wisdom, and grace.
Posted by: Margaret at February 22, 2008 11:57 AMFrank, as Margaret said above, I don't expect you to have to answer for this.
I went down to my office, er, the stacks of mail on the dining room table, and found the letter I received in response to our most recent donation. It contains no hint that anything was going on other than business as usual--every letter from SWTS over the past few years has contained similar rhetoric. I know it's been dicey but at the end of Mark Sisk's tenure, it didn't seem on the verge of closing, and I think the stakeholders are owed an explanation of how we got here.
It's a heckuva way to celebrate the 150th anniversary of the school.
For the faculty, my main concern is your future, and that is in my prayers.
Posted by: Emily Schnabl at February 22, 2008 01:14 PMYes - what Margaret & Emily said. But mostly, lots of prayers for you and the whole on-the-block community right now.
Posted by: Susie at February 22, 2008 05:02 PMHi Frank,
As "Baruch," I've been out of commission these days, but the flesh-and-blood me has you and AKMA in his prayers. Mrs. Grazer sends her love too. Yours,
B