« Brother of the Deceased | Main | Suffering and Misery »
April 27, 2005
Setting the agenda
Okay...here I am kicking and screaming...KICKING AND SCREAMING making a blog entry. Blogging's not my thing, but it's something that I've gotta do, so here goes (that's life, eh?)
I attended a clergy community organizing training session yesterday (today, too...so I'm on a time crunch). We talked about the "political agenda" and how things move on and off it. We talked about how the "right" is very good about developing and staying on message, while the "left" speaks from disunity and distractedness. The "right" has a clear, consistent message...therefore they have more power and more items on the political agenda.
No, this entry's not about politics, or why the democrats are usually in response mode, but I do see a parallel with Biblical Theology.
It seems to me that BibTheo is about "setting the agenda" in our parishes and wider church. When what we might call "questionable theology" has a consistent, well-argued voice, then it becomes the agenda, while other theologies are left scrambling in response mode.
Think about typical responses to personal tragedy..."I have [name the terminal illness], therefore God is punishing me." Or "God must have needed my infant more, that's why God called him/her home."
Where are these messages coming from and why are they such common responses for many? I suggest that one type of theology has set the agenda, and we "progressive" pastoral types function in response mode (think CPE visits) to counter this. Even our class assignments are labeled "developing biblical resources for RESPONDING TO [...]."
So after yesterday's exercise at my conference, I'll begin looking at BibTheo somewhat differently. What can I do in the parish to move the "theological agenda" in a healthier direction?
That's all...gotta go.
Dan
Posted by Dan S at April 27, 2005 07:44 AM
Comments
Dan,
This is a good idea. We talked briefly in class yesterday about how the time to develop a theology of death with your congregation is not in the wake of a tragedy, but on a bright, sunny, summer afternoon when everything is hunky-dory. That's when people can concentrate on stuff like the 15th chapter of 1 Corinthians. If they can concentrate on it, and it is talked about enough in a clear, pastoral, and educational manner, it might begin to sink in. Then, when something inevitable does happen, they have that in their background to inform their reaction and their grief. This same method works for most every other topic we're covering too. The last thing we want to hear when we're down in the dumps over something is, "Give it to Jesus. Jesus will carry your load." "Yeah, well, if Jesus will carry my load how come my back still hurts?" It's not the time to develop a theology of suffering or angst, but rather, when we're feeling at the top of game is when we need to think about that kinda stuff. Anyway, just a few thoughts. I'd love to hear more about your conference!
-R
Posted by: Ryan Whitley at April 27, 2005 07:52 PM
I have heard something similar to what Dan expressed many times. "Oh, God needed a little flower in his garden, so he called your baby to heaven" or "I have cancer (or some other disease) because I did such and such a thing." I have a real problem with a theology that says that God punishes sins by afflicting people with calamities, misery, and sickness. I can see where the idea comes from. "Obey and live." Or, "disobey and die." I just have a hard time reconciling that with God who is Love and who sent his Son to become incarnate for us to free us from sin and give us life to its fullest. "I have called you by name? I love you? Now I'm going to make you suffer for all the times you didn't do the right thing?" Where does that fit with God's steadfast love, compassion, and mercy?
Gutierrez points out in the assigned reading that suffering is not God's "ideal" for us (136). I don't believe, as someone once told me, that we are born to suffer all our lives and then die. I will agree that suffering is a part of every human life. But, it is a part for which we cannot give a very good explanation, and for which the questions we ask are not resolved by Scripture. Answering the question by saying that suffering is a punishment for our sins or is a test of faith doesn't fit well for me. Unfortunately, our readings and my search through Scripture have't given me any better answer. For now, I will just have to be satisfied with knowing that, when those things that cause suffering come around, I am not alone in my adversity. As the psalmist says, God is strength, shield, rock, protector, deliverer, and comforter.
Posted by: cat's mom at May 4, 2005 04:39 PM
Christian Formation of Children spoke to this last night. The professor was talking about preaching as a form of Adult Formation and how our delivery of a sermon can lead people into a relationship with scripture, if we allow it to. I was captivated by the focusing of the lens on this point: one of the things people struggle with in their relationship with God is not having a relationship with scripture. I think many people, myself included, have a relationship with scripture where it seems we have come in in the middle of the story and don't really have a grasp of the whole BIG PICTURE. Part of my call is to move away from the use of scripture as a tool for teaching only moral imperatives (Do this and don't do that) and into a dramatic engagement with God's living story which is given to us.
Posted by: Jenni Liem at May 24, 2005 01:44 PM