Errata
p.204ff (MC)- Several paradigms omit moveable nu; others include it but not in parentheses.
p.213 - (MC) The nom neut sg pres act ptc of thre&w is throu~n (w/ circumflex on upsilon), not thrw~n. A similar mistake is made with the same paradigm of plhro&w: it is plhrou~n, not plhrw~n.
In the appendix of principal parts, beginning p.220:
(MC) Q: would it be useful at the "top" of the columns to give the principal part
#s? Or, perhaps better, a reminder at the top of each column what the
principal part represents (present active, etc.), what tenses and voices are
built from that pp, and perhaps even what lesson introduces this pp? Your
other paradigms in appendix 3 are labeled and I think this is a good idea. (AKMA) this sounds like a good idea to me; I may even have suggested it in the inital draft of the appendix. I'll try for some degree of labelling in the corrected edition.
On p. 209 and throughout the paradigms on following pages, movable nu is not shown with the forms that take movable nu.
On p. 209, in the Future Tense paradigm, the right-hand paradigm is for the Future Middle only--not the Future Passive.
On p. 210, in the third-person singular, First aorist active indicative, the nu at the end of the verb is movable.
On p. 218, for some reason the first row of genitive forms is labelled with an upper-case "F" instead of a "G."
p.220 (MC): The 6th pp of a)gora&zw should have the accent on the penult (h)gora&sqhn) not the antepenult.
p.220 (MC): The 2nd example of the 3rd pp for amarta&nw should have the rough not smooth breathing: h#marton.
On p. 220, the perfect active principal part of a)nabai/nw should be a)nabe&bhka.
p.220 (MC): The 3rd pp of a)pokri/nomai has two accents; the second is correct.
p. 221 (MC): The 6th pp for ginw&skw is e)gnw&sqhn (omit the third letter, an epsilon).
On p. 221, the aorist passive principal part of gra/fw should be e)gra/fhn.
On p. 222, the aorist passive principal part of du&namai should be h)dunh&qhn. There is an occasional alternate form that appears in the Septuagint: h)duna&sqhn.
p.223 (MC) The 2nd pp for euxariste&w should not have a circumflex on the final omega.
On p. 223, the future principal part of qauma&zw should be qauma&sw.
p. 224 (MC) The 6th pp for le&gw is ele&xqhn, not ele&gqhn (chi not gamma before theta).
p. 224 (MC) Why a second option for the 4th pp of lei/pw? It is an optional 3rd pp not 4th (i.e. a 1st aorist for a 2nd) but this form is not attested in the NT; either omit or move to the 3rd pp column. (AKMA) I suppose I included it out of a lust for thoroughness; I'll either omit or move it back where it belongs.
p. 225 (MC) The 6th pp for oikodome&w has a circumflex over the initial omega; it should be a smooth breathing instead.
p. 226 (MC) The 2nd pp for pi/ptw (pesou~mai) has an extra accent: the acute on the antepenult should be omitted.
p. 226 (MC) The 6th pp for pi/nw should have a smooth breathing, not an acute accent, over the antepenult.
p. 226 (MC) Q: why no pp's given for pi/mplhmi, which occurs far more often than, e.g., lei/pw. (AKMA) Sheer oversight. No better reason.
p.226 (MC) The 3rd pp for poie&w has an extra sigma in the final syllable: should be e)poi/hsa.
p.227 (MC) The 3rd pp for fe&rw should also include the 2nd aor h!negkon.