| ΑΚΜΑΖΙΛΛΑ | ||||
To AKMA's Seabury-Western Home Page Email me at Seabury AUTHENTICITY PREMISES Voice, Authenticity, Style, Politics Faculty and Administration of the University of Blogaria Prof. of Hyperlinked Humanities, Primus Inter Pares David Weinberger Provost and Vice Chancellor of Imaginary Affairs Frank Paynter Vice President/Development Director and Porter Wealth Bondage Registrar Halley Suitt Dean of Memetic Engineering and Reader of Thoughts Kevin Marks Research Professor of Markup Cryptology Phil Ringnalda Murasaki Shikibu and Sei Shonagon Foundation Professor of Early Japanese Literature Jonathan Delacour Abraham J. Simpson Chair of Desultory Conjecture Steve Himmer Clued Professor of Micro-journalism and Women's Studies Jeneane Sessum Prof. of Digital Psychometry Eric Norlin Prof. of Priapic Ideation Christopher Locke Prof. of Comparative Kim Novak Ray Davis Ho Chi Minh Chair in Vietnamese Studies & American Poetry Joseph Duemer Section 508 Prof. of Web Accesibility and Useability Mark Pilgrim Professor of Haemophagy and Laputan Linguistics Naomi Chana Harley Davidson Saddle of Comparative Literature Tom Matrullo Prof. of Melanesian Hermeneutics Alex Golub Prof. of Linguistics Dorothea Salo Zimmerman Professor of Music and Poetics Mike Golby Senior Lecturer in Tlonian Area Studies and Chaplain A. K. M. Adam Szarkowski Chair of Photography Jeff Ward Prof. of Analytic Philosophy and Korean Area Studies Stavros Alfred E. Newman Foundation Chair in International Blogging Relations Shelley Powers Prof. of Gluation and Scissorology Mark Woods Professor of Folklore & Mythology Renee Perlmutter Crone-in-Residence, Purveyor of Eclectic Mysticism and Professor of Rhetorical Ritual Elaine de Kalilily Prof. of Fractured Philosophy Tom Shugart Director of Music, Blogaria School of Divinity Tripp Hudgins House Band Shannon Campbell Audio-Visual Guy Josiah Adam Campus Cat Dizzy, at Allan Moult's place DAILY BLOGS The Usual Posse Doc Searls Dave Rogers Victor Echo Zulu Gary Turner Textism Jordon Cooper Elke (Sisco) Zimmermann sacra doctrina Mike Sanders ZINES The Ekklesia Project Fellowship
Member of the JOHO Curling Team ![]()
|
Saturday, August 17, 2002 ( 11:26 AM ) McCloud on LaurelMy hero Scott McCloud (okay, he's one of my heroes) offers a very cool graphical commentary on some themes of Brenda Laurel’s recent Utopian Entrepreneur at the MIT Press website.DRMA: "See His Blessed Face", Sister Wynona Carr; "Been Listening All the Day by", Blind Joe Taggart. Friday, August 16, 2002 ( 11:18 PM ) Shelley SezBurningbird urges her partners in digital diversion to dedicate their diligence to defending Davezilla, resolute resister of reptilian cease-and-desist letters. And when Bb asks, who am I to resist? Take that, you corporate hacks who defame the reputation of Japan's monstrous hero-defender!Permalink -Main Page- ( 12:15 PM ) Monkey CookeryDash as quickly as possible to Cooking with Monkey page. Margaret and I haven’t tried any of the recipes, but we’re laughing heartily at the brilliant narration. I came to the link via boing boing (thanks, Cory), who cites the Sorbet in a Sack recipe, but (delightful as the sorbet recipe no doubt is) our favorite is Guacamole and nachos. It’s so funny that I had to blog this before I got back to the movie reviews below.they make you feel good And I’m not recommending HiMonkey only because of photographic evidence that he (she?) too is one of the Sudsy Studs of Weblogging. But I can’t wait for the calendar. . . . DRMA: “To Your Love,” Fiona Apple; “ Sinner,” the Finn Brothers. Thursday, August 15, 2002 ( 10:45 PM ) Cinema Corner“Signs” versus “xXx”—First of all, I should stipulate that Margaret has a weakness for movies in which things explode. (She was an ardent supporter of the old “Farm Film Report” on SCTV.) Our pacifist family sublimates its temptations to violence by enjoying James Bond movies, gangster and caper movies, and various other low-rent diversions.So the theological contemplations of “Signs” are not necessarily an unfair match against the reptilian reactivity of “xXx.” We have enjoyed both at successive matinees in this “second honeymoon rehearsal” week. “Signs” scared the bejeebers out of us; Margaret even shrieked at one point, and we spent lots of time clutching each other’s hands. Now that’s probably related to the bereft-spouse theme, but all in all it did its job quite effectively. The family dynamics were powerfully, lovingly sketched; the child actors did a tremendous job of communicating both the cloud that hung over their house, and their deep love for their father and uncle. (By contrast, Gibson slipped over the top once or twice.) Joaquin Phoenix depicted his character beautifully and gently. Nonetheless, I was left with a less than savory aftertaste. My theological vocation intervened, provoking me to wonder to what species of clergyperson Mel Gibson bleonged. He evidently was accustomed to the idea of hearing confessions (suggesting that he was on the more catholic end of the spectrum, though ovisouly not Roman Catholic), but he refers to himself as “a reverend,” a locution that most Episcopal clergy eschew (we’re priests, and even our more protestant clergy probably refer to themselves as “ministers” rather than “reverends.” “Reverend” is an adjective, as in “the Reverend Mr. Hess,” not a noun, as in “I’m not a Reverend any more.” But that’s probably too persnickety of me. More substantively, I guessed the pivotal plot device early on in the movie, and I kept wondering why Mel Gibson didn’t make the connection himself. Likewise, at a tremendously important moment of the plot, no one called the police—not that the police could necessarily have done anything, but it struck me as so natural an action as to require explanation when Gibson didn’t do it. And Shyamalan’s aspiration to Hitchcock’s legacy stood out too pointedly. He shows every sign of deserving the succession—Hitch had ups and downs, too—but his subtlety convinces me more readily than his allusive claims to the throne. So in the end, the movie did its work, very powerfully, but was not quite as persausive in retrospect as it was in the viewing. By contrast, “xXx” (to which I went as a sign of my utter devotion to my beloved) began with several marks against it: the unlikeliness of Vin Diesel as a plausible hero, the inevitably derivative txture of yet another spy action movie; even the proximity of the upcoming Bond feature. I was prepared to wince my way through a halfbaked ripoff of the classics of the genre. Yet Diesel convinced me; not that his character was true to life, or was anything but a flesh-and-blood comic-book character, but that the cutout had been crafted with intelligence and craft. Indeed, Diesel has so prepared for an X franchise that I’d advise Bond to lay low for a while. Bond just can’t expect to rival Diesel’s visceral adrenalin rush, and he’s bound to seem dowdy when compared to Diesel’s unvarnished carnality. The plot shows the same typical holes that generally beset such thrillers. At one point, Diesel hollers, “That boat will get to the city in thirty minutes,” without his having any information on that topic, and everyone else in the movie seems not only to have accepted his word, but to have synchronized their timers to his shouted estimate—and the relative speeds of the boat inthe water and the car on the road seem capriciously related. But I expect that of spy movies; all this one lacked was a digital timer that slowed after it hit thirty seconds and stopped altogether at 00:00:01. So Vin Diesel looked unlikely, but won me over; and Night Shyamalan promised much, and delivered, but with a vague letdown afterward. Who'd have guessed? DRMA: “Strange Brew,” Buddy Guy; “ “Hard Headed,” James Cotton; “Into the Fire,” Bruce Springsteen; “Junco Partner,”, James Booker; "Come On Back", Keb Mo; "When That Great Ship", William & Verey Smith ; "Working My Way Back to You", Spinners; "He Can Be Found", Louvin Brothers; "Moist", Morphine "Nothing Happened Today", Boomtown Rats; "I Pity the Poor Immigrant", Bob Dylan; "Walk On Gilded Splinters", Johnny Jenkins & Duane Allman; "Tear Off Your Own Head (It's a", Elvis Costello; "Maybe", Alison Krauss; "Mississipi", Bob Dylan. Permalink -Main Page- ( 10:42 PM ) Weblogging vs. JournalismMargaret notes that one of the differences between webloggers and journalists seems to be that bloggers write more than journalists.Everyone, let's go over Halley's to play! ( 10:15 AM ) Limited IncI've been trying to keep in touch on the Teaching and Technology blog and the mediAgora blog, and frankly, I don't have enough to say to keep busy on three different ones. I ranted more about copyright over at Kevin's place, and I added some links at T&T, but this page has been coming in a sorry third.This afternoon, I'll see about commenting on “Signs,” which Margaret and I saw yesterday as part of our rehearsal-for-a-second-honeymoon week (we saw “Poltergeist” as part of our first honeymoon, so there's a certain symmetry at work here). Short preview: some quibbles, but it scared the bejeebers our of Margaret and me. Glad we went to a matinee. Permalink -Main Page-Wednesday, August 14, 2002 ( 10:27 PM ) Retrospect and ProspectThe Wabash Conference went exceptionally well. The Wabash staff make everything happen well; it's a delight to work with them.I feel just as strongly as yesterday that the issues of control, copyright, and credentialling overshadow academic uses of technology to an unnerving extent. I felt that even before I heard the full version of Lessig's OSCon talk (thanks to Doc Searls for the link). To that end, I'll be applying for a Wabash Center grant to pull together a web presence for what Mary Hess kept referring to as "Open Source theological education." My working motto for the sight: "Wisdom wants to be free." Anyone looking over the live-blogging notes from the conference might get the impression that Dr. Weinberger got short shrift in the discussion. That's due to two factors: first, our discussion was interrupted so that we might be given a tour of the new Center for the Liberal Arts at Wabash College; and second, I joined into the discussion with a vigor that inhibited my typing effectively. Suffice it to suggest that the conference hosted a very active discussion of what it means to be human, what makes relationships "count," and numerous offshoots of David's book. It was too engaging for me to sit still, and as a result the notes don't convey the depth of the discussion. So if I were to receive the grant in question, does anyone recommend one hosting service over others? I'm shopping for an ISP too, and an ideal solution would be a reliable hosting service with broadband access in Evanston and tollfree access numbers from around the US. And a mint on the pillow at night. Permalink -Main Page- Tuesday, August 13, 2002 ( 11:10 PM ) Home Again, AgainAfter a long day in the Indianapolis International Airport (I think there’s one scheduled flight a day to Blogaria), and after a plane flight that was more exciting than there was any need to be, I am home again with Margaret and no children (they're away at camp), not even Jennifer (she went back to New York). I'll have plenty to say when I wake up tomorrow, but for now I have only to say: Goodnight. Permalink -Main Page-Monday, August 12, 2002 ( 9:26 AM ) Wabash III: IdeasOur Wabash Center Conference continues today. I presume to observe that many of the issues we're discussing involve three central issues: Power, Copyright, and Credentialling.Power obtrudes in discourse in various ways--in global ways (the digital divide), in local ways (the control issues that mark institutional information technology policies), in personal ways (our specific online personalities and their behavior), to cite but a few. Copyright, as many of us have said before and often, has become not so much a protection for creators but a subsidy for corporate wealth, and this threatens educational practices in practically every imaginable way. Credentialling warps the pursuit of knowledge to satisfy organizational regulation. To the extent that a perceived need for credentials determines education's goals, such artifical notions as "credit," "courses" (clearly delimited periods and durations for learning), "grades," and "degrees" will seem self-evidently necessary. Contrariwise, these concepts do not ordinarily characterize learning, but the industrial production of credentials. But now Mary's outlining Larry Lessig's arguments in Code and The Future of Ideas, so I have to go back to Wabash. Permalink -Main Page- Sunday, August 11, 2002 ( 10:57 AM ) Wabash II: TechnologyIf you're at all interested in issues relative to teaching and technology, please come by the Wabash Center blog for the conference we're conducting now. We're having a great discussion, and we could benefit from any feedback that comes our way.Please give it a look and if you want to send us a message, feel free to email me. All times are local. Local times may vary. Minutes do not expire. A. K. M. Adam That which we have not yet bothered to imagine is not therefore impossible. |
He seems like a nice guy. Has he written any books? Would he come speak to us?
|
||